A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of Alabama’s new law cracking down on illegal immigration, ruling Monday that she needed more time to decide whether the law opposed by the Obama administration, church leaders and immigrant-rights groups is constitutional.
This means the law won’t take effect as scheduled on Thursday. The brief order did not go into whether the law is constitutional, and the judge could still let all or parts of the law take effect later. A longer ruling will be issued by Sept. 28 after the judge has had more time to consider lawsuits filed by the Justice Department, private groups and individuals that claim the state is overstepping its bounds with the law.
The law includes provisions requiring police to verify the status of people stopped whom they suspect may be in the country illegally. The law also makes it a crime to knowingly rent housing to unlawful immigrants. It would require schools to verify the citizenship status of students. Officials say it wouldn’t prevent illegal immigrants from attending public schools. Both supporters and opponents say Alabama’s law is the nation’s toughest against illegal immigration.
The National Conference of State Legistlatures created a FAQ on the E-Verify program. Here is the link to the FAQ: http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?TabId=13127
The E-Verify program was created as a voluntary Internet-based pilot program to help employers verify the work authorization of new hires. This program remains voluntary in California but 18 states have an E-Verify requirement. In 2011 alone, ten states enacted legislation requiring the use of E-Verify – Alabama, Florida (executive order), Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia. Eighteen states now have an E-Verify requirement.
The program applies to U.S. citizens and noncitizens. The program is administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in partnership with the Social Security Administration.
The Department of Justice challenged the state of Alabama’s recently passed immigration law, H.B. 56, in federal court this week stating that the law conflicts with federal immigration law and undermines the federal government’s immigration enforcement priorities and objectives. Alabama’s law is designed to affect virtually every aspect of an unauthorized immigrant’s daily life, from employment to housing to transportation to entering into and enforcing contracts to going to school. H.B. 56 criminalizes mere unlawful presence and, like Arizona’s law, expands the opportunities for Alabama police to push aliens toward incarceration for various new immigration crimes by enforcing an immigration status verification system. The federal government’s suit is consistent with the department’s position in United States v. Arizona, in which the department last year successfully obtained a preliminary injunction against Arizona’s S.B. 1070. The government’s brief said that the mandates that H.B. 56 imposes on Alabama law enforcement may also result in the harassment and detention of foreign visitors, legal immigrants and even U.S. citizens who may not be able to readily prove their lawful status. The government further argues that the Alabama law would impose burdens on children by demanding that students prove their lawful presence, which could discourage parents from enrolling their children in school.
Jon Stewart again offered some humor on the humorless situation in Arizona in his report titled The Naturalized. Last year Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed a bill that made it a crime to be an undocumented immigrant in the state. The law is being challenged in federal court. On Tuesday critics of the polarizing immigration law in Arizona protested in triple-digit heat outside Major League Baseball’s All-Star Game in downtown Phoenix, drawing sideways glances from fans who were more interested in getting to the game. The protests were not as big as predicted. Last year after SB1070 initially passed, activists called for baseball to move the All-Star game from Arizona. Commissioner Bud Selig declined and said it was a political issue, prompting critics to ask players, coaches and fans to boycott the game as part of a wider call for companies to stop doing business with Arizona. Although at the time several baseball players spoke out against the law and said they might skip the All-Star game if picked, the protests largely fizzled out and there was no indication Tuesday that any players or coaches wouldn’t play because of the law.
Two separate pro-immigrant groups protested outside of Chase Field before the game, with one quietly passing out white ribbons that symbolized peace and unity and the other loudly chanting in bullhorns and marching in circles with signs that read “Boycott hate” and “Stand with us.”
President Obama gave a speech today in El Paso, Texas on the need for immigration reform. He asked for a bipartisan effort to overhaul the nation’s immigration laws to deal with the millions of skilled and unskilled workers already here illegally. The President’s trip was part of a series of events to promote his support for immigration reform legislation. The President urged Congress to act on this issue and reiterated his legislative aims: A path to citizenship for illegal immigrants that would require them to come forward, pay taxes and a penalty, and learn English; legal status to encourage foreign college graduates and other skilled non-citizen residents to remain and start businesses; and the so-called Dream Act, providing citizenship to young people who were brought to the United States as children and receive an education or want to enter the military.
Here is a link to the text of his speech: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/us/politics/11obama-text.html
The recent USA Today article, More of the World’s Talented Workers Opt to Leave USA, describes how the US is losing its best and brightest due to these foreign national’s opportunities at home, but also immigration delays. The CEO of TiE Global, a worldwide network of professionals who promote entrepreneurship, explains, “If the country is going to maintain the kind of economic well-being that we’ve enjoyed for many years, that requires having these incredibly gifted individuals who have been educated and trained by us.”
On an everyday basis, I find my corporate clients exasperated by long delays in visa processing, unfounded requests for evidence on pending applications, and general frustration in the delay and amount of time and money spent on immigration petitions. One high technology client has chosen to relocate research and development activities abroad so it can be assured of choosing the scientists and researchers it needs without the headaches of considering immigration implications with each hiring decision.
Other clients tell me that they will no longer sponsor foreign nationals for work visas due to the headaches involved. This seems to be the answer that many who would have the US close its borders are seeking. However, within a short while, each and every one of these clients has changed this position as they cannot locate a US worker to fill a position which requires higher education in the science, technology, engineering or math fields.
I am in support of creating jobs for US workers, but what many American’s don’t realize is that these innovators are creating jobs. They are developing green energy solutions, creating smaller and smaller electronic devices with more power, and making our cars more fuel efficient. Without these workers, our US COMPANIES would fail. If we want to work on creating more jobs for US workers, let’s turn our attention towards our education system and training our students to compete on a global level rather than turning to the protectionism that will only hurt us in the long run.
The immigration debate is emotionally charged. This was certainly evidenced when South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson accused President Obama of lying when he stated that his health care reform bill did not apply to illegal immigrants.
Obama’s health care plan is certainly sweeping and controversial in its own right, but Rep Wilson’s outburst brings up the point that immigration reform also must be addressed. By simply excluding immigrants from his reform proposals, Obama is looking at half the problem. Policies that restrict immigrants’ access to health care such as preventive services lead to the inefficient use of emergency room and other costly services. The economics behind immigration and health care are addressed in the report by the Immigration Policy Institute, entitled, Unequal Accecss: Immigrants and US Health Care.
Dr. Sarita Mohanty, a professor of medicine from the University of Southern California , the author of the report, explains that although immigrants comprised 10 percent of the US population in 1998, they accounted for only 8 percent of US health care costs. Further, she documents that, “despite the fact that all immigrants are eligible for emergency medical services, they had lower expenditures for emergency room visits, as well as doctor’s office visits, outpatient hospital visits, inpatient hospital visits, and prescription drugs.”
Although this report focuses on immigrants and health care, it captures the essence of the immigration debate by underscoring the importance of immigrants to our economy and to our nation. Even pushing aside the fact that we are a nation of immigrants, as besides the Native American’s our ancestors all hail from other nations, the hard facts speak to the importance of immigration. Not only to illegal immigrants perform jobs that native born Americans cannot and will not do, they also contribute to paying taxes and paying into the Social Security system for benefits they will never collect. In 2001, the Social Security Administration (SSA) found that undocumented immigrants pay a major portion of taxes into the Social Security system under names or social security numbers that don’t match SSA records and which payees can never draw upon. As of July 2003, these payments totaled $421 billion.
It’s time to give undocumented immigrants an earned path to legalization so they can obtain health insurance and continue to contribute to our country, rather than focusing the health care debate on a broken immigration system.